Cost Approach Essentials: Methods, Depreciation, and URAR

Cost Approach Essentials: Methods, Depreciation, and URAR

Okay, here’s a detailed scientific chapter outline for “Cost Approach Essentials: Methods, Depreciation, and URAR,” designed for a real estate appraisal training course. This outline incorporates the PDF content provided and expands on it significantly to provide a more comprehensive and scientifically rigorous treatment of the subject.

Chapter: Cost Approach Essentials: Methods, Depreciation, and URAR

I. Introduction: Foundations of the Cost Approach

  • 1.1. Defining the Cost Approach:

    • Explain the fundamental principle: Value is derived from the cost to create a new, equivalent property. This aligns with the principle of substitution.
    • Discuss the role of the cost approach in relation to the Sales Comparison and Income Approaches. Highlight its strengths and weaknesses in different appraisal scenarios (e.g., new construction, special-purpose properties).
  • 1.2. Key Terminology:

    • Cost: Total expenditure required to create a new improvement.
    • Value: An opinion of the most probable price that a property should bring in a competitive and open market.
    • Depreciation: Loss in value from any cause.
    • reproduction costโ“: Cost of creating an exact replica of the subject property using the same materials, design, and construction methods. (Often impractical but valuable for historical properties).
    • Replacement Cost: Cost of creating a substitute property with equivalent utility, using modern materials, design, and construction techniques. (More commonly used).
    • Accrued Depreciation: Total depreciation accumulated from the time of construction to the effective date of the appraisal.
  • 1.3. Theoretical Underpinnings:

    • Principle of Substitution: A buyer will pay no more for a property than the cost to acquire an equally desirable substitute.
    • Supply and Demand: The availability of land, materials, and labor impact construction costs.
    • Highest and Best Use: The cost approach must align with the property’s highest and best use.

II. Cost Estimation Methods: A Detailed Examination

  • 2.1. Comparative Unit Method (Square Foot Method):

    • 2.1.1. Principles and Application:
      • Explanation: Cost is estimated by multiplying the area of the improvement (square footage) by a unit cost per square foot.
      • Formula: Total Cost = Area (sq ft) * Cost per sq ft
      • Discuss the importance of accurate area measurement. Consider building codes and standards for calculating gross living area (GLA).
      • Example (based on PDF): A house with 1280 sq ft living area at $60/sq ft and a 576 sq ft garage at $25/sq ft. Calculate the total building cost.
    • 2.1.2. Deriving Unit Costs:
      • Market Analysis:
        • Process: Collect sales data on comparable new construction.
        • Equation: Unit Cost = (Sales Price - Site Value) / Building Area
        • Example (based on PDF): A 1500 sq ft house sold for $120,000, with a site value of $30,000. Calculate the unit cost.
        • Discuss the challenges of isolating site value accurately.
      • Cost Estimating Manuals/Services:
        • Overview: Introduce Boeckh, Marshall & Swift, R.S. Means, and other resources.
        • Explain how these manuals provide average unit costs for different construction types, sizes, and styles.
        • Address the need for licensing and online access.
    • 2.1.3. Adjustments to Unit Costs:
      • Size and Shape: Smaller buildings often have higher unit costs due to fixed costs (e.g., kitchen, bathrooms) spread over fewer square feet. Explain perimeter-to-area ratio effects.
      • Complexity of Design: Elaborate on the example of the square vs. L-shaped building (Figure 8-2 from PDF). Show how perimeter wall length impacts cost.
        • Experiment: Create several building shapes with the same square footage but varying perimeters. Calculate the theoretical cost difference based on a hypothetical wall cost per linear foot.
      • Construction Features: Discuss adjustments for above-average finishes, upgraded materials, custom features.
      • Time (Market Conditions): Explain how to adjust for changes in construction costs between the publication date of the manual and the effective date of the appraisal.
        • Formula: Adjusted Cost = Original Cost * (Current Cost Index / Original Cost Index) (Similar to Cost Index Trending, but applied to unit costs).
      • Location: Adjust for local cost variations (labor rates, material prices, building codes).
      • Entrepreneurial Profit: Include a percentage for builder’s profit.
      • Example (based on PDF Figure 8-3): Walk through the detailed adjustment process step-by-step. Explain the calculations for exterior finishes, size, time, location, and entrepreneurial profit.
  • 2.2. Unit-in-Place Method:

    • 2.2.1. Principles and Application:
      • Explanation: Estimate the cost of individual building components (foundation, walls, roof, etc.) and sum them to get the total cost.
      • Formula: Total Cost = ฮฃ (Quantity of Component * Unit Cost of Component)
      • Highlight the importance of accurate measurement and quantity estimation.
    • 2.2.2. Obtaining Unit Costs:
      • Use local builders, developers, cost manuals, or costing services.
    • 2.2.3. Measurement Consistency: Emphasize the critical importance of using consistent units (linear feet for wall framing, square feet for wall surface painting, etc.).
      • Experiment: Give students a blueprint and ask them to calculate the cost of wall framing using a cost per linear foot and then the cost of painting using a cost per square foot. Stress accuracy in conversions.
    • 2.2.4. Adjustments:
      • Time (Market Conditions) and Location: Similar to the comparative unit method.
      • Indirect Costs and Entrepreneurial Profit: Must be explicitly included.
    • 2.2.5. Advantages: Accounts for differences in size and complexity more directly than the square foot method.
      • Example (based on PDF Figure 8-5): Illustrate how different building shapes with the same square footage can have different exterior wall framing quantities.
  • 2.3. Quantity Survey Method:

    • 2.3.1. Principles and Application:
      • Explanation: Most detailed method; separate estimates for labor, materials, equipment, and overhead for every component.
      • Formula: Total Cost = ฮฃ (Material Cost + Labor Cost + Equipment Cost + Overhead) for each component.
      • Discuss the role of subcontractors in providing detailed cost estimates.
    • 2.3.2. Level of Detail: Compare to the Unit-in-Place Method (Example from PDF): Wall framing (lumber, sheathing, labor, scaffolding) is estimated separately in the quantity survey method.
    • 2.3.3. Practical Use: Primarily used by contractors and builders for bidding purposes.
    • 2.3.4. Advantages and Disadvantages: Most accurate but most time-consuming.
  • 2.4. Cost Index Trending:

    • 2.4.1. Principles and Application:
      • Explanation: Adjust the original construction cost based on changes in a construction cost index.
      • Formula: Current Cost = Original Cost * (Current Index Value / Original Index Value)
      • Example (based on PDF): A house built in 1980 for $100,000, with an index of 150 then and 200 now. Calculate the current cost.
    • 2.4.2. Reliability: Least reliable method. Assumes original cost was typical and that the index accurately reflects cost changes.
    • 2.4.3. Best Use: For double-checking results from other methods.

III. Estimating Depreciation: Identifying and Quantifying Loss in Value

  • 3.1. Defining Depreciation in Appraisal:

    • Depreciation = Cost - Market Value
    • It’s NOT the same as accounting depreciation (book depreciation).
    • Accrued Depreciation: Depreciation that has occurred up to the effective date of the appraisal.
  • 3.2. Age and Economic Life:

    • Actual Age (Chronological Age): The number of years since construction.
    • Effective Age: The apparent age based on condition and market appeal. It reflects how “old” the property feels and functions.
    • Economic Life (Useful Life): The period during which the improvement contributes to the property’s value. It ends when the improvement is no longer the highest and best use.
    • Physical Life: How long the improvement could physically last with normal maintenance (usually longer than economic life).
    • Remaining Economic Life: The time remaining until the end of the economic life.
    • Relationships:
      • Economic Life = Effective Age + Remaining Economic Life
      • Effective Age = Economic Life - Remaining Economic Life
      • Remaining Economic Life = Economic Life - Effective Age
    • Example (based on PDF): House built in 1980, appraised in 1994. Actual age = 14 years. Economic life = 50 years. Remaining economic life = 40 years. Effective age = 10 years.
    • Explain how deferred maintenance, renovations, and market trends affect effective age.
  • 3.3. Types of Depreciation:

    • 3.3.1. Physical Deterioration:
      • Definition: Wear and tear, damage to physical components (broken windows, leaky roof, etc.).
      • Curable vs. Incurable:
        • Curable: Cost to cure < increase in value.
        • Incurable: Cost to cure > increase in value.
      • Long-Lived vs. Short-Lived Items:
        • Long-Lived: Foundation, framing (lasts the life of the building).
        • Short-Lived: Roofing, carpeting, appliances (needs replacement during economic life).
    • 3.3.2. Functional Obsolescence:
      • Definition: Design defects, outdated features, or inefficiencies (poor floor plan, inadequate insulation). “Built-in” obsolescence.
      • Deficiencies vs. Superadequacies:
        • Deficiencies: Something lacking (e.g., small closets, poor ventilation).
        • Superadequacies: Over-improvements; cost > contribution to value (e.g., overly expensive materials).
      • Curable vs. Incurable: Same criteria as physical deterioration.
    • 3.3.3. External (Economic) Obsolescence:
      • Definition: Loss in value from factors outside the property (e.g., proximity to a noisy airport, declining neighborhood, zoning changes).
      • Generally Incurable: Property owner has little or no control.
  • 3.4. Methods of Estimating Depreciation:

    • 3.4.1. Economic Age-Life Method (Straight-Line):
      • Principles: Assumes a constant rate of depreciation over the economic life.
      • Formula: Depreciation = (Effective Age / Economic Life) * Cost
      • Accrued Depreciation Rate: Effective Age / Economic Life
      • Limitations: Doesn’t account for varying rates of depreciation or different types of obsolescence.
      • Example (based on PDF): Reproduction cost = $220,000. Economic life = 60 years. Effective age = 15 years. Calculate depreciation.
      • Modified Age-Life Method: Adjust for curable items before calculating the age-life depreciation.
        • Adjusted Cost = Reproduction Cost - Cost of Curable Items
        • Depreciation = Cost of Curable Items + ((Effective Age / Economic Life) * Adjusted Cost)
    • 3.4.2. Sales Comparison Method (Paired Data Analysis):
      • Principles: Analyze sales of comparable properties with and without the specific defect.
      • Process: Identify comparables with the defect and comparables without it. The difference in sale prices is the depreciation amount.
      • Example (based on PDF): Houses with a poor floor plan sell for $110,000, while similar houses with good floor plans sell for $120,000. The depreciation due to the poor floor plan is $10,000.
    • 3.4.3. Capitalization Method:
      • Principles: Capitalize the income loss caused by the defect.
      • Process: Identify comparable properties with and without the defect. Calculate the difference in their rental income. Capitalize that income difference using an appropriate capitalization rate.
      • Formula: Depreciation = (Income Difference / Capitalization Rate)
      • Multiplier Method: Use a gross rent multiplier to estimate the value difference.
      • Example (based on PDF): Properties near an airport rent for $800/month, while similar properties in better locations rent for $900/month. If the capitalization rate is 8%, calculate the depreciation.
    • 3.4.4. Cost to Cure Method:
      • Principles: The depreciation due to curable items is equal to the cost of repairing or replacing those items.
      • Conditions: Must be physically possible, legally permissible, and economically feasible (cost <= increase in value).
    • 3.4.5. Observed Condition Method (Breakdown Method):
      • Principles: Estimate each type of depreciation (physical, functional, external) separately using various techniques (straight-line, sales comparison, capitalization, cost to cure).
      • Most comprehensive but also most complex.

IV. The Uniform Residential Appraisal Report (URAR) and the Cost Approach

  • 4.1. URAR Structure:
    • Overview of the URAR form and its purpose.
  • 4.2. Cost Approach Section on the URAR:
    • Location of the Cost Approach section.
    • Required Information (based on PDF Figure 8-7):
      • Estimated Site Value
      • Estimated Reproduction or Replacement Cost New (based on square footage)
      • Depreciated Cost of Improvements
      • “As-is” Value of Site Improvements
    • Comment Section: Importance of providing detailed explanations for cost estimates, site valuation, square footage calculations, and remaining economic life. Need for addenda if space is limited.

V. Advanced Topics and Considerations

  • 5.1. The Role of Technology:
    • Mobile technology for accurate measurements and data collection.
    • Online cost databases and resources.
  • 5.2. Sensitivity Analysis:
    • Explore how changes in cost estimates, depreciation rates, and site values affect the final value conclusion.
  • 5.3. Reconciliation of Value Indicators:
    • Weighing the reliability of the cost approach compared to the sales comparison and income approaches.
    • Explain how to reconcile different value indications into a final, supported value opinion.

VI. Case Studies and Practical Exercises

  • 6.1. Scenario 1: Appraising a New Construction Home:
    • Detailed example using the cost approach, including site valuation, cost estimation (using multiple methods), and minimal depreciation.
  • 6.2. Scenario 2: Appraising an Older Home with Significant Depreciation:
    • Example involving all three types of depreciation. Students will apply different depreciation methods and reconcile the results.
  • 6.3. URAR Completion Exercise:
    • Students complete the Cost Approach section of a URAR form based on a provided property description and data.

VII. Conclusion

  • Review of the key concepts of the cost approach.
  • Importance of accuracy, thoroughness, and professional judgment.
  • Ethical considerations in cost estimation and depreciation.

VIII. Chapter Summary (Based on PDF)

  • Recap of the main points covered in the chapter.

IX. Chapter Quiz (Similar to the questions in the PDF, but expanded to cover all aspects of the chapter)

This expanded chapter outline provides a more scientifically grounded and comprehensive approach to teaching the cost approach in real estate appraisal. The inclusion of formulas, experiments, and practical examples will enhance the learning experience and provide students with the skills and knowledge necessary to apply the cost approach effectively in their appraisal practice.

Chapter Summary

Scientific Summary: Cost Approach Essentials: Methods, Depreciation, and URAR

This chapter from “Mastering Real Estate Appraisal” focuses on the cost approach to real estate valuation, specifically examining its essential methods, the concept of depreciation, and its application within the Uniform Residential Appraisal Report (URAR). The cost approach estimates value by summing the estimated land value with the depreciated cost of improvements. This approach relies on the principle of substitution, suggesting that a buyer will pay no more than the cost to acquire an equivalent substitute property.

Key Scientific Points:

  • Cost Estimation Methods: The chapter explores several methods for estimating the cost of constructing a new improvement, including:

    • Comparative Unit (Square Foot) Method: This method utilizes market-derived unit costs (e.g., cost per square foot) for different building components (living area, garage) and applies them to the subject property’s dimensions. Accuracy depends on comparable data and adjustments for differences in features, size, location, and time.
    • Unit-in-Place Method: This involves estimating the cost of individual building components (foundation, walls, roof) by multiplying the quantity of each component by its installed unit cost. This method is more detailed than the square foot method and inherently accounts for some design variations.
    • Quantity Survey Method: The most detailed approach, it involves a comprehensive breakdown of all costs, including labor, materials, equipment, overhead, and entrepreneurial profit, for each building component. This method is commonly used by contractors and builders.
    • Cost Index Trending: This less reliable method uses construction cost indices to adjust original construction costs to currentโ“ values.
  • Depreciation Estimation: A core element is estimating accrued depreciation, which represents the loss in value due to various factors.

    • Types of Depreciation: The chapter identifies three categories of depreciation:
      • Physical Deterioration: Loss of value due to wear and tear or damage to physical components.
      • Functional Obsolescence: Loss of value due to design inefficiencies, outdated features, or superadequacies (over-improvements).
      • External (Economic) Obsolescence: Loss of value stemming from external factors like location or adverse economic conditions.
    • Curable vs. Incurable Depreciation: Depreciation is categorized as curable if the cost to remedy the defect is less than the resulting increase in value, and incurable otherwise.
    • Depreciation Estimation Methods: Several methods are presented for quantifying depreciation:
      • Economic Age-Life Method (Straight-Line): Assumes a constant rate of depreciation over an asset’s economic life. Depreciation is calculated based on the ratio of effective ageโ“ (apparent age based on condition) to economic life.
      • Sales Comparison Method: Analyzes market data to determine the price difference between comparable properties with and without the defect.
      • Capitalization Method: Similar to the sales comparison method, but uses differences in incomeโ“ (rent) between comparable properties and capitalizes the income difference to estimate the value loss.
      • Cost to Cure Method: Equates the amount of depreciation due to curable items with the cost of curing the defects.
      • Observed Condition (Breakdown) Method: Estimates each type of depreciation separately using various techniques.
  • URAR Application: The chapter explains how the cost approach is reported within the Uniform Residential Appraisal Report (URAR), emphasizing the required information, including site value, reproduction/replacement cost, depreciated cost of improvements, and “as-is” value of site improvements.

Conclusions and Implications:

  • The cost approach is most applicable for new or relatively new properties with minimal depreciation. Its reliability decreases with age and complexity of depreciation.
  • Accurate cost estimation and depreciation analysis are crucial for a reliable cost approach. Appraisers must carefully select appropriate methods, considering data availability and property characteristics.
  • The cost approach provides a valuable check and balance to the other appraisal approaches (sales comparison and income capitalization) and is particularly important when comparable sales data is limited.
  • Understanding the URAR requirements ensures proper application and documentation of the cost approach in residential appraisals. The increasing use of mobile technology to fill out the URAR form is changing how the cost approach is being implemented in the field.

Explanation:

-:

No videos available for this chapter.

Are you ready to test your knowledge?

Google Schooler Resources: Exploring Academic Links

...

Scientific Tags and Keywords: Deep Dive into Research Areas