English
Lead Exposure Management: Systems and Accountability
I. Introduction: The Thermodynamics of Lead Loss
A. Failure to service leads promptly results in dissipation of energy investment, analogous to entropy increase.
1. Entropy (S) is a measure of disorder.
2. S can be defined as a measure of the probability that a lead will not convert to a client. unserviced leadsโ increase S.
B. The “Burning Desk” represents rapid degradation of lead value due to delayed follow-up, following an exponential decay model.
II. Lead Servicing Systems: A Queuing Theory Perspective
A. Lead management can be modeled using queuing theory.
1. ฮป (Arrival Rate): Average rate at which leads arrive.
2. ฮผ (Service Rate): Average rate at which leads can be processed.
3. ฯ (Utilization Rate): ฯ = ฮป/ฮผ. If ฯ โฅ 1, the queue becomes unstable.
4. Little’s Law: L = ฮปW.
* L = Average number of leads in the system.
* W = Average time a lead spends in the system.
B. Optimizing Service Rates (ฮผ) to Minimize Lead Waiting Time (W):
1. Conduct A/B testing on response times.
2. Measure conversion rates. Statistical analysis determines if the difference is significant.
3. P(conversion|delay) = Pโ * e-kt
* P(conversion|delay) is the probability of conversion given a delay of t.
* Pโ is the initial probability of conversion.
* k is a decay constant.
* t* is the delay time.
C. CRM systems act as the central processing unit for lead storage, tracking, and assignment, minimizing randomness and enhancing system predictability.
III. Accountability Metrics: Statistical Process Control (SPC)
A. KPIs need to be monitored using SPC techniques.
1. Examples of KPIs: Lead Response Time, Contact Rate, Conversion Rate, CPA, CLTV.
2. Control Charts: Visual tools to monitor process stability, consisting of a center line (mean), UCL, and LCL.
3. Example: Average lead response time is 2 hours, standard deviation is 0.5 hours.
* Center Line (CL) = 2 hours
* UCL = CL + 3ฯ = 3.5 hours
* LCL = CL โ 3ฯ = 0.5 hours
B. Statistical Significance Testing: Hypothesis testing to determine if changes in KPIs are statistically significant.
1. Null Hypothesis (Hโ): No significant difference in conversion rates.
2. Alternative Hypothesis (Hโ): There is a significant difference in conversion rates.
3. Choose a significance level (ฮฑ), typically 0.05.
4. Perform a t-test or ANOVA.
5. If the p-value is less than ฮฑ, reject the null hypothesis.
IV. Human Factors and Cognitive Load
A. High cognitive load leads to errors, delays, and burnout.
B. Reducing Cognitive Load:
1. Task Automation: Implement automated email sequences, SMS reminders, and CRM workflows.
2. Prioritization: Use lead scoring models.
* Lead Score = wโ * (Factor 1) + wโ * (Factor 2) + … + wn * (Factor n)
3. Delegation: Distribute lead servicing responsibilities.
V. Iterative Improvement: The Scientific Method in Lead Servicing
A. Apply the scientific method to refine lead servicing processes.
1. Observation: Identify bottlenecks.
2. Hypothesis: Formulate a testable hypothesis.
3. Experiment: Conduct a controlled experiment (A/B testing).
4. Analysis: Analyze the data.
5. Conclusion: Implement changes based on the findings.
Chapter Summary
leadโ servicingโ requires a systematic approach with defined roles (Who) and timelines (When). A centralized database is essential (Where) for tracking follow-up history, next actions, and responsible parties. Contact management software drives these processes.
A functional system facilitates staff training and performance monitoring, enabling performance standards, accountability, and identification of effective/ineffective individuals.
Failure to service leadsโ promptly results in lost revenue. Leadership generates leads, while the team implements systems for servicing them, documenting processes for duplicability, standardization, and accountability.
